Email us at info@servantfinancial.com to talk to a financial advisor today!

Email us at info@servantfinancial.com

Trump Era 2.0, Donald’s Version

The stage is set, the self-tanner is more orange than ever, and the star of the show has arrived. Donald Trump was elected the 47th President of the United States on November 5, 2024, winning both the popular vote and the Electoral College. Largely fueled by Rural America, President Trump’s victory sent shock waves worldwide, impacting both voters and financial markets. The equity and crypto markets seemingly embarked on a love story with the president-elect, as his potentially business-friendly tax policies and the most pro-crypto treasury stance propelled these asset classes to immediate gains. However, not all asset classes were enchanted by Trump’s victory. Concerns over the president-elect’s plans to Make America Healthy Again and potential healthcare reforms  have caused Big Pharma and the healthcare sector  to tumble, leaving many wondering, “Is it over now?

It is a fool’s errand to try and  predict what the next four years will hold, but we can make some forecasts about financial markets and sector performance based on Trump’s policy statements before, during, and after the election. Before diving into those projections, however, we must first revisit the president-elect’s first term in office as a prequel.. Are you ready for it?

The First Era

Donald Trump served as the 45th President of the United States from 2017 to 2021, defeating Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in a historic election. Trump was the first president without prior experience in public office or the military, bringing a unique background in corporate America and reality television to the role. Comparing the red and blue maps of the United States from 2016 to today reveals a strikingly similar picture, with the notable exception of the swing state of Nevada. Shifts in the Electoral College reflect changes in population, as many Americans have moved away from traditionally blue states like California, New York, and Illinois to traditionally red states such as Montana, Texas, and Florida.

Source: AP Poll

Diving into the key events of Trump’s first administration, there are a few notable policy shifts that are likely to set the stage for the direction of his next term. Perhaps, his most significant fiscal policy shift, the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 lowered individual and corporate tax rates across the board that the Biden administration has largely left untouched. The act increased the standard deduction from $6,350 to $12,000, raised the child tax credit by $1,000, reduced corporate tax rates from a range of 15%–39% to a flat 15%, and introduced the Opportunity Zone program.

Source: CNBC

While these policies reduced the tax burden for many Americans, some of President Trump’s other policy decisions were generally viewed as less favorable for the environment. Known for his critical stance on international climate agreements, Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. At the same time, he expanded domestic oil and natural gas production in U.S. waters and near public lands while encouraging private investment in traditional energy resources.

Frustrated by large trade imbalances with China and Chinese infringement of U.S. intellectual property rights, Trump initiated a trade war with one of America’s largest trading partners. He imposed significant tariffs on Chinese goods, costing American households an average of $625 annually and increasing tax collections by $200 to $300 per household. Notably, his successor, Joe Biden, maintained most of these tariffs, with the exception of a few policies related to the EU and Japan.

One of the biggest casualties of these tariffs was American agriculture. A U.S. Department of Agriculture study found that retaliatory tariffs led to a $27 billion decline in U.S. agricultural exports between mid-2018, when the tariffs were introduced, and the end of 2019. The federal government provided $23 billion to U.S. farmers through the Market Facilitation Program to mitigate the impact on flat commodity markets and low export volume.

Who was The Man?

It is not uncommon for the incoming president to be compared to the outgoing one. So, as we compare Donald Trump with Joe Biden, we might be asking who was our fearless leader and our alpha type? Looking at the numbers behind each administration, we see a varied picture. While inflation was certainly higher under Biden, Trump added more to the federal debt level than the outgoing President. Both presidencies were impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and despite varied economic conditions GDP growth was similar under both administrations. The S&P 500 saw greater gains under the former business executive, Donald Trump, and more recently the S&P 500 has rewarded investors by returning 18% since his re-election. While there historically isn’t a strong correlation between the political party in office and the performance of the stock market, Trump’s tax plans for corporate America have created an early indicator of what might be to come in the next 4 years.

  Trump Biden
GDP Growth 2.3% 2.2%
Inflation 1.9% 5.4%
Average Unemployment Rate 5.04% 4.11%
S&P 500 Return 16.3% 12.6%
Increase in Federal Debt Level 39% 29%
Average Gas Price $2.57 $3.60

 

Era 2.0

But on Wednesday, after the election was called, we saw it Begin Again. President Trump’s second term is likely to be a bigger show with lots of friendship bracelets exchanged this time around. There are several key aspects to Trump’s Policy 2.0 plans that financial markets will likely be paying close attention to. Below is a summary of his many and varied  fiscal policy intentions floated during his election campaign:

  • Lower corporate income tax from 21% to 20%
  • Lower corporate income tax rate to 15% for those who make their products in the U.S.
  • Increase child tax credit to $5,000
  • Exempt Social Security benefits from taxation
  • Exempt tip income & overtime pay from taxation
  • Create a deduction for auto loan interest
  • Create a tax credit for family caregiver
  • Eliminate green energy subsidies from Inflation Reduction Act
  • Tax large private university endowments @ 1.4%
  • Impose universal baseline tariffs on US imports of 10% to 20% and/or reciprocal tariffs
  • Impose a 60% tariff on all US imports from China

 

Both Donald Trump’s and Kamala Harris’s plans were likely to add to the federal deficit with Vice President Harris’s plan likely adding $3.95 trillion to the federal deficit and President-elect Trump’s plans adding $7.75 trillion. It will be interesting to watch the possible impact of Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by billionaire technologists Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. The pair aim to cut at least $500 billion in annual spending, but there are lingering questions about how DOGE recommendations to control federal spending will be implemented and sustained.

Perhaps one of the most widely discussed policy proposals of this past election has been Trump’s position on tariffs. Economists estimate that if the tariffs are raised to his proposed level, it will add 0.9% to the rate of inflation with increased costs being passed on to consumers. The tariffs are also expected to cost U.S. Farmers somewhere between $0.9 – $1.4 billion. However, many believe Trump’s tariff plans are just a negotiating tactic part of a broader geopolitical and economic plan. For example, Trump recently announced that he will immediately slap 25% tariffs on all goods imported from Canada and Mexico until the shared borders are secured to prevent illegal drugs and immigration into the United States.

In last month’s article, we discussed some of the likely stock market winners and losers under a Trump regime. Those “winners” have experienced large equity gains in associated companies over the past few weeks. Elon Musk’s Tesla has experienced a 40% increase since Trump’s victory and Bitcoin has soared to almost $100,000 causing sparks to fly across financial markets. Nuclear energy, banks, and defense and weapons companies have also shown gains in recent weeks.

In the end, we know all too well that “nothing safe is worth the drive.” As we embark on Trump Era 2.0- Donald’s Version, the world waits with bated breath, balancing hopes for economic prosperity with concerns over inflation, global relations, and deep state countermeasures. His proposed fiscal policies, the bold strokes of a self-proclaimed disruptor, could “paint the town blue,” but at what cost? Some industries are singing their “Love Story” with large market gains, while others brace themselves, wondering if perhaps “we are never ever getting back together” with normalcy.

As we analyze the past to forecast the future, let’s remember that every stage of history is unpredictable. We’re all just “dancing with our hands tied,” hoping to weather the storm. Whether you’re cheering or jeering, this Trump Era 2.0 promises to be remembered “all too well.” It will either unite us or drive us further apart.  As Abraham Lincoln declared, “A house divided against itself cannot stand… I do not expect the Union to be dissolved.  I do not expect the house to fall, but I do expect it will cease to be divided.  It will become all one thing or all the other.”

 

Polymarket Predictions and Policy Perturbations

With less than 30 days remaining before the 2024 Presidential and other elections on November 5th, investors’ eyes are focused on the electoral outcomes and the potential market impacts.

The Presidential race remains very tight between Vice President, Kamela Harris, and former President, Donald Trump.  It appears that the path to the White House will hinge on just seven key swing states: Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Georgia, and critically important Pennsylvania with its 19 electoral votes. Current trends and polls suggest the path to 270 electoral votes will be difficult for either candidate without securing Pennsylvania.  Perhaps we now know why it’s called the Keystone State.

We begin by introducing subscribers to Polymarket for an alternative perspective on the electoral college and what we the people are collectively thinking.  Polymarket is the world’s largest prediction market. It provides registered traders the opportunity to profit from their beliefs and insights by betting on the outcome of future events across various topics such as politics, sports, and pop culture.  Polymarkets reflect accurate, unbiased, real-time probabilities for significant global events. Note, however, Polymarket is unavailable to U.S. residents of the United States because it has not obtained appropriate license(s) from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

According to Polymarket, research shows prediction markets are often more accurate than polls or pundits. Polymarket traders aggregate news, polls, and expert opinions, making informed trades with the expectation of profit. Traders’ economic incentives ensure market prices adjust to reflect “true” odds.  Polymarkets always seek the truth (Latin: “semper veritas”).  According to Polymarket, this makes prediction markets one of the best sources of real-time event probabilities.

So, without further ado, we present the Polymarket U.S. Presidential election market predictions as of 8:30 am on Thursday, October 10, 2024, below:

Source: Polymarket https://polymarket.com/event/presidential-election-winner-2024?tid=1728566107442

 

Note that there is $1.6 billion of volume on this particular polymarket.  The market rules provide “This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald J. Trump wins the 2024 US Presidential Election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”  The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race for the same candidate by the inauguration date (January 20, 2025) this market will resolve based on who is inaugurated.”

Let’s now look at the potential market perturbation each candidate’s policies may have on equity markets. In the long run, there is little evidence suggesting that the political party elected has a directional influence on broad markets. U.S. Bank investment strategists examined market data over the past 75 years and concluded that financial market performance in the medium to long term is minimally impacted by election outcomes. The big drivers of financial market performance remain inflation indicators and broad economic trends.

In the short run, however, specific sectors can benefit based on who is in office and their policies in place. Once again we find that Goldman Sachs is doing “God’s work” and has developed proprietary equity portfolio baskets for each candidate with a Democratic victory basket and a Republican victory basket.  Given their proprietary nature, the equity basket securities are not broadly available publicly, but various market participants have provided a general overview of sector preferences and hypothetical stock picks that might be influenced by the policies favored by each party.  Please note that we are simply citing conjecture with the foregoing individual stock and ETFs cited.  We have conducted limited research and these securities absolutely do not represent recommendations:

 

Democratic Victory Basket:

  • Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other green technology companies, like First Solar Inc (ticker: FSLR) or iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ticker: ICLN), due to anticipated continued emphasis on environmental regulations and the funding of “community-based climate projects.”
  • Healthcare: Companies that might benefit from healthcare reform or expansion, like those involved in Medicaid programs, such as a large managed care organizations (MCOs) like Elevance Health (ticker: ELV) or iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (ticker: IHF), or health technology leaders, like Boston Scientific (ticker: BSX) or iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (ticker: IHI).
  • Technology: While tech is often considered bipartisan, Democrats might push for more tech regulation on “misinformation or disinformation” while at the same time supporting innovation in certain tech subsectors, especially those linked with green tech or social platforms with obedient, progressive companies, like Meta Platforms, Inc. (ticker: META).
  • Consumer Discretionary: Companies that might benefit from policies aimed at increasing minimum wages or enhancing consumer protections. This basket might potentially include companies like Target (ticker: TGT) or other companies with strong ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices such as those represented in the iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ticker: ESGU). ESGU represents a potential Democratic trifecta basket in and of itself with 34% allocation to technology, 16% to consumer businesses, and 12% to healthcare.
  • Education: Companies related to education technology or services, like Coursera, Inc. (ticker: COUR) might also see benefits due to potential increases in educational spending.
  • Infrastructure with a focus on Sustainability: Companies that work on modern infrastructure, including smart cities, electric vehicle infrastructure, etc. Such companies may be found in the First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index ETF (ticker: GRID)

 

Republican Victory Basket:

  • Financials: Banks and financial institutions often benefit from deregulation, which tends to be a Republican policy initiative. Companies like JPMorgan Chase & Co (ticker: JPM) or The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ticker: XLF) could be included.
  • Energy: Traditional energy and fossil fuel sectors, like oil and gas companies, might be favored due to lower emphasis on environmental regulations with a “drill baby drill” mindset. Think of companies like ExxonMobil Corporation (ticker: XOM) and The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (ticker: XLE).
  • Defense: Although the world was mostly a peaceful place under the 45thS. President, increased defense spending has historically been associated with Republican administrations. Lockheed Martin (ticker: LMT) or Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (ticker: PPA) could be examples. (Personally, I would fade the defense sector as an area of potential focus under Elon’s Government Efficiency Commission since it has the greatest potential for taxpayer savings.)
  • Industrials and Materials: With policies often focusing on infrastructure or domestic production, companies in these sectors might benefit. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (ticker: FCX) or SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (ticker: NANR) may be included.
  • Pharmaceuticals: Less focus on regulating drug prices could be seen as positive for big pharma. Consider companies like Eli Lilly and Company (ticker: LLY) and The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (ticker: XLV).   (Personally, I think of this sector as an area of risk given Robert Kennedy, Jr. grand alliance with Trump and his focus on Making America Healthy Again.)
  • Bitcoin/Crypto: Trump is expected to lay out “a plan to ensure the United States will be the crypto capital of the planet.” Consider Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (ticker: FBTC) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (ticker: FDIG) which includes Coinbase Global, Inc. (ticker: COIN) and several bitcoin miners.

 

Please note that Goldman Sachs also offered proprietary short baskets for each party, but we have only summarized Goldman’s longs.

Whether or not you accept the “veritas” of Polymarket, you may be interested in another good exchange of real-time event probabilities with the handicapping being done by capital market investors.  The graphic below presents the relative performance of Goldman’s Victory Baskets through October 9, 2024:

 

Source: Zero Hedge https://x.com/zerohedge/status/1844168635000160748

 

As the chart above depicts, markets are constantly re-handicapping probabilistic outcomes. There is still plenty of race left in this two-horse contest as we come around the bend into the home stretch.  Voter turnout will be critically important, particularly turnout among young voters. This cohort has typically left political decisions more in the reins of their elders and has historically demonstrated lower participation rates. Since 1988, voter turnout amongst those aged 18 to 29 years has averaged 42%, compared to 56% for those aged 30 to 44, 66% for those aged 45 to 59 years, and a 69% voter turnout for those 60 years and older.  As the pundits are wont to say, veritas is stranger than fiction.  We’ll all just have to see what happens.

 

“This is the chief thing: be not perturbed, for all things are

according to the nature of the universal.”

~ Marcus Aurelius

white-arrow